#Steam stellaris galaxy edition code full#
Therefore I will either wait for a full game release with all the content, not just some cosmetic stuff thrown in, or I will perhaps forget about it entirely. But I did check out Paradox's other releases, and I noticed a trend of DLC stacking in a "buy your guns for 5$, now buy your bullets for another 5" fashion. I've watched a few of the reviews, and the game looks good. I would re-evaluate your position if I were you. In a single player game, where the choice of wallpaper is more important then let's say the color of your Deagle in CS:GO. Take a look at The Sims 3 for example, 600$ worth of DLC's, 350 of which is cosmetic. Your statement parrots many people who give free passes to such practices and results in the avalanche of garbage spewn out by companies. One DLC for 20$ that has new races, new units, new structures, new music, new whatever, is much better than 5 DLCs 5$ each that sport a similar amount of content + cosmetics. Single player games get value by content. In single player games, those should be free. Paid Cosmetics are for multiplayer games where you cannot upset balance between players. This is the logic that lets EActivision fart in player faces and charge for it. If that is your approach, how about having an X instead of a portrait? Just cosmetic right? So what if your race looks like walking sausages but are supposed to be robots. That is so wrong, it represents everything disfunctional in the current industry. That sounds like the most innocuous kind of paid content. I don't see why portraits or species packs should be in the game or free, they're purely cosmetic content that one loses nothing if you choose not to purchase it.
Originally posted by WALLY:While some of their DLC content should have been in the base game or free ( portraits and species packs ), the other DLC is resonably priced compared to say anyone published by EA.
0 kommentar(er)
